TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blackburn v. Blackburn

Blackburn v. Blackburn, 513 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 21, 1987
Docket
No. 86-3138
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
513 So. 2d 136012 Fla. L. Weekly 2468

Opinion — Per Curiam

513 So.2d 1360 (1987)

Wallace BLACKBURN, Appellant,

v.

Anne E. BLACKBURN, Appellee.

No. 86-3138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 21, 1987.

David A. Maney and A. Ann Arledge, Tampa, for appellant.

John D. Fernandez, Clearwater, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court requiring the husband to pay the wife's attorney's fees and costs. The comprehensive judgment dissolving the parties' marriage included a scheme of equitable distribution of marital assets resulting in a nearly equal division of those assets. The husband's net worth remained substantially greater than that of the wife. Further, his longtime record of income production and his earning ability were substantially superior to those of the wife. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge and, accordingly, affirm the order. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980); O'Steen v. O'Steen, 478 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). See Smith v. Smith, 495 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1988: 21989: 41990: 21991: 21992: 41993: 31995: 11996: 11998: 119882026peak 1989 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Straley v. Frank612 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Nisbeth v. Nisbeth568 So. 2d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
  3. Straley v. Frank585 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Kennedy v. Kennedy622 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
  5. Adair v. Adair720 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
  6. Ugarte v. Ugarte608 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Most recent

  1. Adair v. Adair720 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
  2. Kendall v. Kendall677 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
  3. Wiederhold v. Wiederhold655 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
  4. Dralus v. Dralus627 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
  5. Kennedy v. Kennedy622 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
  6. Holmes v. Holmes613 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980) 2,222
Smith v. Smith, 495 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list