Blackburn v. Blackburn
Opinion
513 So.2d 1360 (1987)
Wallace BLACKBURN, Appellant,
v.
Anne E. BLACKBURN, Appellee.
No. 86-3138.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 21, 1987.
David A. Maney and A. Ann Arledge, Tampa, for appellant.
John D. Fernandez, Clearwater, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of the trial court requiring the husband to pay the wife's attorney's fees and costs. The comprehensive judgment dissolving the parties' marriage included a scheme of equitable distribution of marital assets resulting in a nearly equal division of those assets. The husband's net worth remained substantially greater than that of the wife. Further, his longtime record of income production and his earning ability were substantially superior to those of the wife. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge and, accordingly, affirm the order. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980); O'Steen v. O'Steen, 478 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). See Smith v. Smith, 495 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(no abuse of discretion to award fees and costs where equitable distribution, but husband had greater net worth, income record and earning ability)
-
(no abuse of discretion to order husband to pay wife's attorney's fees and costs notwithstanding equitable distribution where husband had greater net worth, longtime record of income production, and superior earning ability)
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.