Estes v. State
In Re Charles William Estes v. State of Alabama. Ex Parte Charles William Estes.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied because the admission of the ordinance is not a prerequisite to admission of the results of the PEI test. In denying this writ, we point out that we do not necessarily agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals' holding on "harmless error." Nor, do we agree that in Patton v. City of Decatur , 337 So.2d 321 (Ala. 1976) there was no other evidence of intoxication.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("The state . . . introduced a duly certified and authenticated copy of the methods and regulations adopted and approved by the State Board of Health governing the performance of the test.")
-
(court's original opinion withdrawn and substituted on rehearing)
Cited by 30 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.