TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Boatner v. Slusher, Inc.

Faye BOATNER, Claimant-Respondent, v. SLUSHER, INC., Employer-Appellant, and Continental Casualty Company, Insurer-Appellant

Boatner v. Slusher, Inc., 614 S.W.2d 35 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 20, 1981
Docket
No. 11915
Judges
Prewitt
Citations
614 S.W.2d 351981 Mo. App. LEXIS 2670

Opinion — Prewitt

PREWITT, Judge.

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission made a “temporary or partial award” to the employee pursuant to § 287.-510, RSMo 1978. The employer and insurer appealed to the circuit court which affirmed the award.

While not questioned by the parties, this court is obligated to determine if it has appellate jurisdiction.

Frey v. Gabel, 574 S.W.2d 38, 39 (Mo.App.1978). Section 287.490, RSMo 1978, provides for appeal from a “final award” of the commission. A *36 final award under § 287.490 is one which disposes of the entire controversy between the parties.

State ex rel. Faris v. Eversole, 332 S.W.2d 879, 881 (Mo. banc 1960). The decisions appealable in workmen’s compensation proceedings are only those expressly declared to be appealable by statute. Id. 332 S.W.2d at 880-881 . We find no statutory authorization for appeals from temporary or partial awards. Such awards are not final and there is no appeal from them.

State ex rel. Prescott Laundry Co. v. Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Commission, 320 Mo. 1156 , 10 S.W.2d 916, 918 (banc 1928);

Melvin v. Harrison Engineering and Construction Co., 232 Mo.App. 382 , 107 S.W.2d 836, 840 (1937);

State ex rel. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Richardson, 227 Mo.App. 1221 , 61 S.W.2d 409, 410 (1933). The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review the award and neither do we.

The appeal is dismissed.

All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1982: 11983: 21987: 11989: 11991: 11992: 11993: 11994: 11995: 22018: 119822026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. Ozark Lead Co.741 S.W.2d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987)
  2. Blanford v. Robinett's Motor & Truck Service, Inc.865 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
  3. Hillenburg v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center879 S.W.2d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
  4. Grassmuck v. Autorama Auto Equipment & Supply Co.659 S.W.2d 264 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)
  5. Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express819 S.W.2d 338 (Mo. 1991)
  6. Plummer v. United Savings & Loan Ass'n781 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Ab Elec., Inc. v. Franklin559 S.W.3d 38 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
  2. Abel ex rel. Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard Service901 S.W.2d 299 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
  3. Clancy v. Armor Elevator Co.899 S.W.2d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
  4. Hillenburg v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center879 S.W.2d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
  5. Blanford v. Robinett's Motor & Truck Service, Inc.865 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
  6. Hayes v. American Standard Insurance Co.829 S.W.2d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Faris v. Eversole, 332 S.W.2d 879 (Mo. 1960) 12
State ex rel. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Richardson, 61 S.W.2d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 1933) 8
State ex rel. Prescott Laundry Co. v. Mo. Workmen's Comp. Comm'n, 10 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. 1928) 8
Melvin v. Harrison Eng'g & Constr. Co., 107 S.W.2d 836 (Mo. Ct. App. 1937) 6
Frey v. Gabel, 574 S.W.2d 38 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list