TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Dallas

Ex Parte Donald Dallas. (Re Donald Dallas v. State).

Ex Parte Dallas, 711 So. 2d 1114 (Ala. 1998)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 13, 1998
Docket
No. 1961457
Judges
Maddox
Citations
711 So. 2d 11141998 WL 110620

Opinion — Maddox

Donald Dallas was convicted of the capital offense of murder during the commission of a kidnapping and a robbery. See §§ 13A-5-40 (a)(1) and (2), Ala. Code 1975. By a vote of 11-1, the jury recommended that he be sentenced to death. The trial judge accepted the jury's recommendation and sentenced Dallas to death.

The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Dallas's conviction and death sentence and subsequently overruled his application for rehearing. Dallas v. State , 711 So.2d 1101 (Ala.Crim.App. 1997). We granted certiorari review pursuant to Rule 39(c), Ala. R.App. P.

Dallas raises the same issues here that he argued in the Court of Criminal Appeals. We have thoroughly reviewed the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion, which addressed each of these issues on the merits, and we have considered the arguments made in Dallas's brief and advanced by his counsel during oral arguments. We have given specific attention to Dallas's argument that the trial judge erred in not instructing the jury on reckless murder and on criminally negligent homicide and that the judge erred in not granting a continuance. We have also examined the record for any plain error. Based on our review, we find no reversible errors in either the guilt phase or the sentencing phase of Dallas's trial. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, COOK, BUTTS, 1 and SEE, JJ., concur.

1 Justice Butts was not present at oral argument, but on February 24, 1998, he listened to the tape of the oral argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2000: 12002: 12003: 12005: 12020: 120002026peak 2000 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Donald Dallas v. Warden964 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2020)
  2. Washington v. State922 So. 2d 145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
  3. Adams v. State955 So. 2d 1037 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
  4. Ex Parte Borden769 So. 2d 950 (Ala. 2000)
  5. Dallas v. Haley228 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (M.D. Ala. 2002)

Most recent

  1. Donald Dallas v. Warden964 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2020)
  2. Washington v. State922 So. 2d 145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
  3. Adams v. State955 So. 2d 1037 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
  4. Dallas v. Haley228 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (M.D. Ala. 2002)
  5. Ex Parte Borden769 So. 2d 950 (Ala. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dallas v. State, 711 So. 2d 1101 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997) 45

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list