Stanley v. United States
James B. STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Et Al., Defendants
Subsequent history: aff'd, Stanley v. United States, & Joseph R. Bertino, 786 F.2d 1490 (11th Cir. 1986). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION GONZALEZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE has come before the Court for review sua sponte upon examination of its order entered October 28, 1983 and cited at 574 F.Supp. 474 (S.D.Fla.1983). By this order, the Court seeks to correct two scrivener’s errors in the text of the opinion. It shall be ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. At 574 F.Supp. at 483 , col. 1, line 8 (slip op. page 14, line 8) the word “There” be changed to “The”.
*1072 2. At 574 F.Supp. at 485 , col. 2, line 25 (slip op. page 18, line 16) the word “independent” be changed to “dependent”.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.