Ex Parte Nicks
Ex Parte Harry Nicks. (Re: Harry Nicks v. State of Alabama).
Opinion
Pursuant to Rule 39(c), A.R.App.P., we granted the defendant's petition to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the defendant's conviction and sentence of death. Nicks v. State , 521 So.2d 1018 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987). After carefully and thoroughly considering the record of trial, the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion, and the briefs and arguments of the parties, we find no basis for reversal of the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
AFFIRMED.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“Under Alabama law, evidence of any offense other than that specifically charged is prima facie inadmissible.”)
-
("If the evidence is not so remote as to lose its relevancy, the decision to allow or not allow evidence of collateral crimes ... rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge.’’)
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.