TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dzur v. Gaertner

James R. DZUR, M.D. Kirk Bowman, Jr., M.D., and Southeast Missouri Hospital, a Benevolent Corporation, Relators, v. the Honorable Gary M. GAERTNER, Judge of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Respondent

Dzur v. Gaertner, 657 S.W.2d 35 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 5, 1983
Docket
No. 47302
Judges
Crist, Dowd, Simon
Citations
657 S.W.2d 351983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4348

Opinion — Crist

CRIST, Judge.

Relators seek a writ of prohibition claiming improper venue in respondent Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Missouri, and therefore a lack of jurisdiction to proceed in a wrongful death action filed against relators in that court. We make the preliminary writ of prohibition absolute.

Helen L. Bates, decedent, resided in Cape Girardeau County (Cape). Drs. Dzur and Bowman, also residents of Cape, medically treated decedent at Southeast Missouri Hospital, similarly located in Cape. On December 30, 1979, decedent was transferred from Southeast Missouri Hospital to Barnes Hospital in the City of St. Louis, where she subsequently died on January 2, 1980.

Larry G. Points, a natural child of decedent, brought an action against Southeast Missouri Hospital and the two doctors in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis alleging malpractice and negligence committed in Cape eventually caused the death of his mother in the City of St. Louis. “(A)n action by statutory beneficiaries for death by reason of malpractice is an action for wrongful death and not an action for malpractice.”

Gramlich v. The Traveler’s Ins. Co., 640 S.W.2d 180, 185 (Mo.App.1982).

A cause of action for wrongful death under § 537.080 et seq., RSMo Supp. 1979 “accrues” in two separate and distinct senses. As to time, for purposes of calculating the statute of limitations, the cause of action “accrues” to the statutory beneficiaries when the death occurs.

Gramlich, supra.

With respect to venue, however, the cause of action “accrues” at the place where the wrong complained of was committed.

See State ex rel. Gerber v. Mayfield, 365 Mo. 255 , 281 S.W.2d 295, 296-97 (1955). Although the statutory beneficiary may not have a cause of action until the decedent dies, the cause of action is not based on the death but on the wrongful causing of the death.

Id.

Therefore, venue is determined by § 508.010 RSMo 1978 and the term “accrued” as used in that statute refers to the place where the wrongful conduct occurred.

Insofar as all defendants reside in Cape Girardeau County and the wrongful acts complained of occurred exclusively in that county, venue in the City of St. Louis is improper. In Missouri, improper venue is a jurisdictional defect.

State ex rel. Hails v. Laskey, 546 S.W.2d 512, 514 (Mo.App.1977). Therefore respondent is permanently prohibited from all further action herein except to dismiss the case, assessing costs against plaintiff, Larry G. Points.

DOWD, P.J., and SIMON, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1985: 11987: 11991: 11992: 21993: 21994: 11996: 21999: 12001: 12002: 12005: 12006: 12025: 119852026peak 1992 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Banta v. Wiesman864 S.W.2d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
  2. Gabriel v. School Dist. No. 4, Libby870 P.2d 1351 (Mont. 1994)
  3. Burgess v. Lucky674 So. 2d 506 (Miss. 1996)
  4. State ex rel. Rothermich v. Gallagher816 S.W.2d 194 (Mo. 1991)
  5. McMillan v. Puckett678 So. 2d 652 (Miss. 1996)
  6. Sunderland v. R.A. Barlow Homebuilders791 A.2d 384 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002)

Most recent

  1. Headley v. State of MissouriNo. 2:23-cv-00052 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 31, 2025)
  2. Natalini v. Little185 S.W.3d 239 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
  3. Chandler v. Multidata Systems International Corp.163 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
  4. Sunderland v. R.A. Barlow Homebuilders791 A.2d 384 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002)
  5. State ex rel. Brandon v. Dolan46 S.W.3d 94 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
  6. Schmidt v. Shearer995 P.2d 381 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Gerber v. Mayfield, 281 S.W.2d 295 (Mo. 1955) 17
Gramlich v. Travelers Ins. Co., 640 S.W.2d 180 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982) 30
State ex rel. Hails v. Lasky, 546 S.W.2d 512 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list