Malu v. City of Gainesville
Opinion
872 So.2d 445 (2004)
Steve T. MALU, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Appellee.
No. 1D04-0049.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 13, 2004.
Appellant, pro se.
Thomas M. Gonzalez and Jennifer Zumarraga of Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's responses to the Court's orders of February 18, 2004, and March 24, 2004, the Court has determined that the order is not final because, although the order grants a motion for summary judgment, it fails to enter judgment. C.f. McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). A determination that "final judgment shall be entered," is insufficient to unequivocally demonstrate finality. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that order granting motion for summary judgment and determining that “final judgment shall be entered” is insufficient to demonstrate an unequivocal completion of the lower tribunal’s judicial labor)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.