Josephson v. Bowers
Opinion
595 So.2d 1045 (1992)
Selma R. JOSEPHSON, Appellant,
v.
Ronald BOWERS, Appellee.
No. 91-0205.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 11, 1992.
Gail Leverett of Kubicki, Draper, Gallagher & McGrane, P.A., Miami, and Hill, *1046 Neale & Murphy, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Kim Cocalis and Kimberly Whitaker of Weaver, Kuvin & Weaver, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant claims error in the trial court's refusal to order a new trial after the jury returned a verdict finding no permanent injury, but awarding appellee damages for past and future loss of income. We agree with appellant that the verdict is inconsistent with the legal requirement in Florida that there be permanent injury before a defendant may be held liable for future loss of income and other future damages in a personal injury claim. Hubbs v. McDonald, 517 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Our conclusion on this issue moots the other claims on appeal.
Since there is no assertion of error in the jury's finding of negligence, we reverse and remand for a new trial on the issues of the permanency of any injuries sustained and on damages.
ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.