Pallas v. State
Opinion
654 So.2d 127 (1995)
John PALLAS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84006.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1995.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Pallas v. State, 636 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), wherein the district court upheld the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We have recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [ 1995 WL 242403 ] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the decision in Pallas on this issue.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
KOGAN, Justice, specially concurring.
With the exception of the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [ 1995 WL 242403 ] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995), (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with majority.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.