Carpenter v. Alonso
Opinion
587 So.2d 572 (1991)
William CARPENTER and Jean Carpenter, Appellants,
v.
Manuel ALONSO, M.D., and Radiology Associates of South Miami, P.A., Appellees.
No. 90-1105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 8, 1991. Rehearing Denied November 1, 1991.
*573 Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Hoppe, Backmeyer & Stokes, Miami, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Lein & McNicholas, and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the trial court limiting expert witnesses in a medical malpractice case to one expert per side. Smith v. Coastal Emergency Services, Inc., 538 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Crawford v. Shivashankar, 474 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Further, permitting the defendant doctor to testify as to his care of the plaintiff would not be a violation of this expert witness' limitation.
Final judgment under review is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(treating physician is not subject to trial court's limitation of one expert witness per side in medical malpractice suit)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.