TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lower Colorado River Authority v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co.

LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. COASTAL STATES GAS PRODUCING COMPANY and Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Respondents

Lower Colo. River Auth. v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co., 551 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 4, 1977
Docket
No. B-6531
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
551 S.W.2d 34020 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 2981977 Tex. LEXIS 23556 Oil & Gas Rep. 395

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In this breach of contract action Lower Colorado River Authority has sought a refund from Coastal States Gas Producing Company of money paid, over and above the amount due under the terms of their contract, for natural gas delivered by Coastal to LCRA between September 1973 and May 1975. Payments at the increased rate were made in compliance with a September 27, 1973 interlocutory order of the Texas Railroad Commission in Gas Utilities Docket No. 500. Coastal filed a counterclaim, and Lo-Vaca Gathering Company intervened as a party defendant. The trial court rendered judgment for LCRA in the sum of $25,218,060.67 which represented the difference between the amount due under the contract and the amount actually paid by LCRA in accordance with the interlocutory order of the Railroad Commission ($26,741,701.67), less the amount due Coastal under its counterclaim ($1,523,641.00). The Court of Civil Appeals reversed, and rendered a take-nothing judgment against LCRA while affirming the award of $1,523,641.00 to Coastal. 544 S.W.2d 733 . LCRA has filed an application for writ of error.

We refuse the writ, no reversible error. In so doing, we deem it appropriate to note that the Railroad Commission, in its interlocutory order, has specifically provided that the final disposition of Docket No. 500 will depend upon the Commission's determination of whether the higher rates without refund have been, and are, required by the public interest. The Railroad Commission entered a final order on April 12, 1976, but withdrew that order on July 10, 1976. It is the duty of the Commission now to proceed to enter its final order, which order will then be subject to review by the courts; and our disposition in the present case does not preclude the parties from asserting any contention, otherwise proper, that may be made on appeal from that order. See High Plains Natural Gas Co. v. Railroad Commis sion, 467 S.W.2d 532 (Tex.Civ.App.1971, writ ref’d n.r.e.);

International Paper Co. v. Federal Power Com’n, 476 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1973).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11981: 11983: 11984: 21987: 11993: 119782026peak 1984 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Public Utility Commission v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.678 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. App. 1984)
  2. PUC of Texas v. Pedernales Elec. Co-Op.678 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. App. 1984)
  3. City of Corpus Christi v. Public Utility Commission of Texas572 S.W.2d 290 (Tex. 1978)
  4. Big Three Industries, Inc. v. Railroad Commission618 S.W.2d 543 (Tex. 1981)
  5. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Brazoria County742 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. App. 1987)
  6. Arkla Exploration Co. v. Haywood, Rice & William Venture863 S.W.2d 112 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1993)

Most recent

  1. Arkla Exploration Co. v. Haywood, Rice & William Venture863 S.W.2d 112 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1993)
  2. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Brazoria County742 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. App. 1987)
  3. PUC of Texas v. Pedernales Elec. Co-Op.678 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. App. 1984)
  4. Public Utility Commission v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.678 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. App. 1984)
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Railroad Commission660 S.W.2d 124 (Tex. App. 1983)
  6. Big Three Industries, Inc. v. Railroad Commission618 S.W.2d 543 (Tex. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Int'l Paper Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 476 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1973) 32
High Plains Nat. Gas Co. v. R.R. Com'n of Tex., 467 S.W.2d 532 (Tex. App. 1971) 23
Coastal States Gas Producing Co. v. Lower Colo. River Auth., 544 S.W.2d 733 (Tex. App. 1976) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list