TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.

Mrs. Seb S. WILCOX Et Al., Petitioners, v. ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO, INC., Respondent

Wilcox v. St. Mary's Univ. of San Antonio, Inc., 501 S.W.2d 875 (Tex. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 14, 1973
Docket
No. B-4215
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
501 S.W.2d 87517 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 781973 Tex. LEXIS 218

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment to determine the ownership of valuable historical documents. The trial court granted a motion for partial summary judgment for St. Mary’s University and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 497 S.W.2d 782 . We order the appeal dismissed, because the trial court has not rendered a final appeal-able judgment.

In May of 1971, the Attorney General, acting on behalf of the Texas Library and Historical Commission, filed suit against Mrs. Seb S. Wilcox, Individually, and as Trustee for the Estate of Seb S. Wilcox, Deceased, William S. Cox, and St. Mary’s University of San Antonio, Texas. Later, Mrs. Genevieve W. Wilcox was made a party to the suit. The suit sought a declaratory judgment as to the Commission’s right of custody and control of the “Laredo Archives.” The “Laredo Archives” are part of a valuable collection of historical documents which were assembled by Seb S. Wilcox during his lifetime. In June of 1971, the City of Laredo filed a petition in intervention seeking title and possession of the “Laredo Archives.”

On September 21, 1972, the trial court granted St. Mary’s “Motion for Severance of Issues, for Continuance of this Cause and for an Extension of Temporary *876 Restraining Order heretofore granted.

The order recites:

. . . this cause shall be tried on its merits but only as to the severed issue of whether the title, whatever its character or quality, claimed by Mrs. Seb S. Wilcox, Genevieve W. Wilcox and William S. Cox in and to the subject documents became the sole and exclusive property of St. Mary’s University by virtue of an unconditional and irrevocable gift of such documents to St. Mary’s University in 1960. . . .

Thereafter, on November 14, 1972, the trial court granted St. Mary’s motion for partial summary judgment. The trial court incorporated the following proviso in its judgment:

. . . nothing herein shall operate to the prejudice of either the State of Texas or the City of Laredo in their claims of title to that portion of the “Wilcox Collection” known as the “Laredo Archives,” said claims of title being still before this Court for adjudication.

The judgment was approved as to form by attorneys for the State of Texas, the City of Laredo, St. Mary’s University, and the Wilcoxes.

The judgment from which the Wilcoxes attempted to appeal simply adjudicates part of a single cause and leaves part of the cause untried and unadjudicated. It is not an appealable judgment, and neither the Court of Civil Appeals nor this Court has any power to review the same. Hall v. City of Austin, 450 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1970) ;

Cf.

Continental Bus Systems, Inc. v. City of Corpus Christi, 453 S.W.2d 470 (Tex.1970).

Under Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, upon granting writ of error and without hearing argument in the case, we set aside the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and dismiss the appeal.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 51979: 11980: 11982: 11985: 11988: 11995: 12006: 12013: 22018: 119752026peak 1975 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.531 S.W.2d 589 (Tex. 1975)
  2. Williams v. Houston-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.531 S.W.2d 434 (Tex. App. 1975)
  3. Cowan v. Moreno903 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. App.—Austin 1995)
  4. Sherer v. Sherer393 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. 2013)
  5. Citizens National Bank of Beaumont v. Callaway597 S.W.2d 465 (Tex. App. 1980)
  6. HOMERIGHT COMPANY v. Exchange Warehouses, Inc.526 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. App. 1975)

Most recent

  1. Michael Grishman v. Roger SimsNo. 05-17-01057-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas July 30, 2018)
  2. Patricia J. Sherer v. James Ray Sherer and Gloria Jean Sherer (f/K/A Gloria Jean Roberson), Individually and James Ray Sherer as Power-Of-Attorney for Bertha M. ShererNo. 06-12-00023-CV (Tex. App.—Texarkana Jan. 4, 2013)
  3. Sherer v. Sherer393 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. 2013)
  4. Capitol Toys, Inc., Toy Maker, Inc., Aviation Dynamics, Inc., and Brett Salter v. Rodika SalterNo. 14-06-00925-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 16, 2006)
  5. Cowan v. Moreno903 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. App.—Austin 1995)
  6. Minns v. Minns762 S.W.2d 675 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Hall v. City of Austin, 450 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. 1970) 102
Wilcox v. St. Mary's Univ. of San Antonio, Inc., 497 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. App. 1973) 4
Cont'l Bus Sys., Inc. v. City of Corpus Christi, 453 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. 1970) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list