State v. Randleston

State v. Randleston, 681 So. 2d 936 (La. 1996)

Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided: October 4, 1996
Docket: No. 96-KK-1646
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 681 So. 2d 9361996 WL 577529

Cited by 15

Opinion — Per Curiam

681 So.2d 936 (1996)

STATE of Louisiana

Fern RANDLESTON.

No. 96-KK-1646.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 4, 1996.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged with one count of simple possession of cocaine residue, and pled guilty as charged. She was adjudicated as a second felony offender. The trial court sentenced her to ninety days, below the statutory minimum of thirty months mandated for a second offender under La.R.S. 15:529.1 The court of appeal affirmed and the state now applies to this court.

Louisiana's judiciary maintains the distinct responsibility of reviewing sentences imposed in criminal cases for constitutional excessiveness. State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762 (La.1979). However, in order to find the punishment mandated by La.R.S. 15:529.1 excessive, the trial judge must find that the sentence makes no measurable contribution to the acceptable goals of punishment or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime. State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993).

Although the trial judge cited Dorthey in his reasons, it does not appear that he made a proper finding that imposition of the statutorily-mandated sentence would be constitutionally excessive. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case remanded to the trial court to justify its deviation from the statutorily-mandated minimum sentence in this case.

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON, J., dissent.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

JOHNSON, Justice, dissenting.

The trial court gave sufficient reasons for departure from the minimum sentence guidelines.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Lindsey770 So. 2d 339 (La. 2000)
State v. Toups833 So. 2d 910 (La. 2002)
State v. Wade832 So. 2d 977 (La. Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Hebert787 So. 2d 1041 (La. Ct. App. 2001)
State v. BOURDA70 So. 3d 82 (La. Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Gass728 So. 2d 896 (La. Ct. App. 1999)

Most recent

State v. Jones107 So. 3d 861 (La. Ct. App. 2013)
State of Louisiana v. Wayne Kevin JonesNo. KA-0012-0864 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2013)
State v. BOURDA70 So. 3d 82 (La. Ct. App. 2011)
State of Louisiana v. Travis BourdaNo. KA-0010-1553 (La. Ct. App. June 8, 2011)
State of Louisiana v. Carol Wayne Crooks, Jr.No. KA-0010-1461 (La. Ct. App. May 4, 2011)
State v. Anderson48 So. 3d 1202 (La. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276 (La. 1993)	2,028
	State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762 (La. 1979)	1,926

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list