People v. Gravlin
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The defendant, William G. Gravlin, *468 was arrested on September 29, 1964, and charged with murder in the first degree. MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548. On January 14, 1965, defendant was adjudicated incompetent to stand trial and committed to Ionia State Hospital. Three years later defendant was adjudicated competent to stand trial. He was tried and convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison, without receiving any credit for the time he spent in custody.
On appeal defendant contends that he should have been given credit against his sentence for the time spent in jail and in custody at Ionia State Hospital prior to his sentence. We agree.
The statute in effect at the time of defendant’s commitment to Ionia (MCLA 767.27; MSA 28.967) was amended effective March 10, 1967, by 1966 PA 266 . A section of the amended statute, MCLA 767.27a(9); MSA 28.966(11)(9) requires:
"Time spent in custody under subsections (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8) shall be credited against any sentence imposed on the defendant in the pending criminal case or in any other case arising from the same transaction. The statute of limitations on the pending criminal charge or any other charge arising from the same transaction shall commence to run on the entry of an order of commitment under subsection (5) of this section and shall continue to run until and unless the committing court determines under subsection (8) that the defendant is competent to stand trial.”
Section 3 of the act states that persons presently committed to Ionia State Hospital are subject to the provisions of this 1966 amendatory act. Therefore, the time defendant spent in custody at Ionia must be credited against his sentence.
The same result is required under MCLA 769.11b; MSA 28.1083(2) which states:
*469 "Whenever any person is hereafter convicted of any crime within this state and has served any time in jail prior to sentencing because of being denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted, the trial court in imposing sentence shall specifically grant credit against the sentence for such time served in jail prior to sentencing.”
This statutory provision is remedial and should be liberally construed to effectuate the statutory purpose sought to be achieved by the Legislature in its enactment.
People v Cohen, 35 Mich App 706 ; 192 NW2d 652 (1971);
People v Potts, 46 Mich App 538 ; 208 NW2d 583 (1973).
A "jail” means a place of confinement and a mental hospital is such a place. A defendant must be given credit against his sentence for time spent in confinement pursuant to governmental authority, regardless of the place of confinement.
People v Noble, 26 Misc 2d 903 ; 207 NYS2d 467 (1960).
This case is remanded to the Oakland County Circuit Court with instructions to grant the defendant credit against his sentence for the days spent in confinement since the date of his arrest.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(statute providing credit “for such time served in jail” entitles defendant to credit for time spent at state hospital)
-
(credit against a sentence must be given “for time spent in confinement pursuant to governmental authority, regardless of the place of confinement.”)
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.