Larimore v. Larimore
Dorothy P. Larimore, Appellee, v. Fay D. Larimore, Appellant
Opinion
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a decree entered in the district court for Douglas County, dissolving the marriage of petitioner and respondent. Respondent appeals, contending that the trial court erred in dividing the parties’ property.
The division of property in dissolution cases is a matter initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial judge.
Qualley v. Qualley, 235 Neb. 841 , 457 N.W.2d 812 (1990);
Ritz v. Ritz, 229 Neb. 859 , 429 N.W.2d 707 (1988).
In an appeal involving an action for dissolution of marriage, an appellate court’s review of a trial court’s judgment is de novo on the record to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, whose judgment will be upheld in the absence of an abuse of discretion.
Qualley, supra.
We have reviewed the record de novo. There is no abuse of discretion. The district court’s decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.