Hillcrest Foods, Inc. v. Briggs (In re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.)
In Re HILLCREST FOODS, INC., Pure 1, Inc., WJM Co., and Mendelson Farms, Inc., Debtors. HILLCREST FOODS, INC., Pure 1, Inc., WJM Co., and Mendelson Farms, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Theodore T. BRIGGS, as He is Superintendent of the Department of Business Regulation for the Bureau of Insurance of the State of Maine, Defendant
Opinion
ORDER REINSTATING SELF-INSURERS STATUS OF DEBTORS FREDERICK A. JOHNSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter, after notice, came on for a preliminary hearing on March 25, 1981. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing evidence from William Bott, financial consultant to the Debtors, and Robert Flynn, consultant to the Debtors in respect to Workers’ Compensation insurance, and after hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court finds that the Department of Business Regulation, Bureau of Insurance of the State of Maine, by Theodore T. Briggs, Superintendent, addressed a letter to Hillcrest Foods, Inc. purporting to summarily suspend the Debtors’ status as a self-insurer under the Workers’ Compensation law. The letter contained the following language:
Under authority of Title 39 M.R.S.A., Section 23(2), I hereby suspend indefinitely the authority of Hillcrest Foods, Inc. to self-insure workers’ compensation benefits in this state, for the reason that the filing of a petition for voluntary bankruptcy by Hillcrest Foods, Inc. constitutes failure to satisfactorily establish solvency and financial ability to pay the compensation and benefits required under the Workers’ Compensation Act... This suspension is effective immediately upon your receipt of the notice....
From the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, including the letter, which was admitted as an Exhibit, the Court concludes that the summary suspension of the Debtors’ status as a self-insurer *580 under the Workers’ Compensation Act may be a violation of Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code [ 11 U.S.C. § 525 ] which prohibits a governmental unit from discriminating against a debtor solely because a debtor is or has been a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.
1
It is, therefore, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the summary suspension of the Debtors’ status as a self-insurer under the Workers’ Compensation Act is void and of no effect and the Debtors are hereby restored to their status as self-insurers under Maine’s Workers’ Compensation Act pending a full hearing upon the Debtors’ complaint which seeks permanent restoration of their status as self-insurers.
1
. Section 525 [ 11 U.S.C. § 525 ] reads in part as follows:
[A] governmental unit may not deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant to, condition such a grant to, discriminate with respect to such a grant against, ... a person that is or has been a debtor under this title ... solely because such bankrupt or debtor is or has been a debtor under this title ..., has been insolvent before the commencement of the case under this title, or during the case but before the debtor is granted or denied a discharge, or has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in the case under this title....
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(summary suspension of debtor's status as self-insurer under Workers’ Compensation statute solely due to Chapter 11 filing violated § 525)
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- In re the Rath Packing Co.
- Rose v. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (In re Rose)
- In re the Bible Speaks
- Rees v. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming(In re Rees)
- Penobscot Valley Hospital v. Carranza, in her capacity as administrator for the
- Calais Regional Hospital v. Carranza, in her capacity as administrator for the
Most recent
- Penobscot Valley Hospital v. Carranza, in her capacity as administrator for the
- Calais Regional Hospital v. Carranza, in her capacity as administrator for the
- In re the Bible Speaks
- Rees v. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming(In re Rees)
- Goldrich v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. (In re Goldrich)
- In re the Rath Packing Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.