Jackson v. Hader
George Washington JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. H. Townsend HADER, Defendant
Opinion
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to file this civil complaint for damages in forma pauperis.
Leave to so proceed is granted.
The action will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The complaint alleges certain misconduct by defendant *991 as plaintiff’s appointed defense counsel in the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri. The complaint does not allege diversity of citizenship. Further, the complaint does not state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act, Sections 1981-1985, Title 42, United States Code, because a lawyer is not a person acting under color of state law within the meaning of the Act. Compare Rhodes v. Meyer, D.C.Neb.1963, 225 F.Supp. 80 , at 93-94 and 107, affirmed 8th Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 709, at 718 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 . The alleged fact that defendant was appointed counsel does not affect the application of the principles stated. Counsel appointed to represent indigent defendants represent such persons in an independent professional capacity; they do not represent the State nor does their representation constitute an action under color of state law within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act.
There being no other basis for jurisdiction, it is Ordered that the complaint be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.