TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Hardy

State of Connecticut v. Raymond Hardy

State v. Hardy, 863 A.2d 699 (Conn. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 8, 2004
Docket
No. SC 17324
Citations
863 A.2d 699272 Conn. 9062004 Conn. LEXIS 566

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?

“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”

*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2006: 12009: 120062026peak 2006 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Hardy896 A.2d 755 (Conn. 2006)
  2. State v. Grant982 A.2d 169 (Conn. 2009)

Most recent

  1. State v. Grant982 A.2d 169 (Conn. 2009)
  2. State v. Hardy896 A.2d 755 (Conn. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Hardy, 858 A.2d 845 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list