TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Samuels v. Tschechtelin

Frank G. SAMUELS v. James D. TSCHECHTELIN, Et Al.

Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 727 A.2d 929 (Md. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1999
Docket
Nos. 21, Sept. Term, 1999
Judges
Submitted to Bell
Citations
727 A.2d 929353 Md. 5081999 Md. LEXIS 168

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 15th day of April, 1999, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal.

See Shoemaker v. Smith, 353 Md. 143 , 725 A.2d 549 (1999). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be divided equally between the parties.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1999: 12000: 22001: 12002: 22003: 22007: 12009: 22015: 119992026peak 2000 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Bowen978 A.2d 678 (Md. 2009)
  2. Samuels v. Tschechtelin763 A.2d 209 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000)
  3. Dawkins v. Baltimore City Police Department827 A.2d 115 (Md. 2003)
  4. In re Foley820 A.2d 587 (Md. 2003)
  5. Maryland Board of Physicians v. Geier123 A.3d 601 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2015)
  6. Addison v. State917 A.2d 1200 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2007)

Most recent

  1. Maryland Board of Physicians v. Geier123 A.3d 601 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2015)
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ferrell982 A.2d 1175 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009)
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Bowen978 A.2d 678 (Md. 2009)
  4. Addison v. State917 A.2d 1200 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2007)
  5. Dawkins v. Baltimore City Police Department827 A.2d 115 (Md. 2003)
  6. In re Foley820 A.2d 587 (Md. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Shoemaker v. Smith, 725 A.2d 549 (Md. 1999) 105

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list