Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River
Opinion
29 N.J. 468 (1959) 150 A.2d 34
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 16, 1959. Decided April 7, 1959.
Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR 5.
For reversal None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.