TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Overby v. Union Laundry Co.

Louise Overby, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Union Laundry Company, Defendant-Respondent

Overby v. Union Laundry Co., 103 A.2d 404 (N.J. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1954
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
103 A.2d 40414 N.J. 526

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jayne in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling and Brennan — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher and Jacobs — 3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11959: 11960: 11963: 11969: 12014: 12015: 12020: 12024: 119582026peak 1958 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Deborah Townsend v. Noah Pierre (072357)110 A.3d 52 (N.J. 2015)
  2. Wayne Davis v. Brickman Landscaping (071310)98 A.3d 1173 (N.J. 2014)
  3. McKinley v. Slenderella Systems of Camden, NJ, Inc.165 A.2d 207 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
  4. Pearlstein v. Leeds145 A.2d 650 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1958)
  5. Pisano v. S. Klein on the Square188 A.2d 622 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
  6. Tomney v. Ebeling251 A.2d 144 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Carla Martinez v. Mid-AmericaNo. A-2286-22 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Apr. 23, 2024)
  2. LESLIE MARTINEZ-GOMEZ VS. UNITED DOMINICANS OF PERTH AMBOY (L-4270-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-3095-18T1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Mar. 5, 2020)
  3. Deborah Townsend v. Noah Pierre (072357)110 A.3d 52 (N.J. 2015)
  4. Wayne Davis v. Brickman Landscaping (071310)98 A.3d 1173 (N.J. 2014)
  5. Tomney v. Ebeling251 A.2d 144 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1969)
  6. Pisano v. S. Klein on the Square188 A.2d 622 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list