TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Jones

In Re Susan N. JONES, Debtor

In re Jones, 107 B.R. 751 (Bankr. D. Idaho 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · Bankruptcy Courts
Decided
September 12, 1989
Docket
No. 18-01555
Judges
Alfred C. Hagan
Citations
107 B.R. 7511989 Bankr. LEXIS 20561989 WL 145069

Opinion — Hagan

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ALFRED C. HAGAN, Chief Judge.

Debtor has claimed an earned income credit in her federal income tax refund in the amount of $856.00 and a portion of a grocery credit in her state income tax refund as exempt property pursuant to Idaho Code § 11-603 (4).

1

The trustee has objected to this claim of exemption alleging both the Federal Earned Income Credit and the State Grocery Credit constitute property of the estate which should be turned over to the Chapter 7 trustee for disbursement to creditors.

EARNED INCOME CREDIT 26 U.S.C.A. § 32 provides for an earned income credit to certain income individuals who are deemed otherwise eligible pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 32 (c)(1). In a pre-code case directly on point, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut reviewed two bankruptcy court decisions holding the opposite ways. One decision held the earned income credit was property of the estate, while the second decision held it was not. On appeal, 2

the District Court held, although given effect through income tax laws, the earned income credit is in substance an item of social welfare legislation intended to provide low income families with the means by which to live. In reaching this conclusion the court addressed the issue of whether the policy of the Bankruptcy Act to afford debtors a “fresh start” and to allow them to accumulate new funds would necessarily require a portion of the tax refund check attributable to earned income be treated differently from that portion attributable to excess withholding taxes. The Court determined this would require an examination of congressional purpose in establish *752 ing the earned income credit. The Court held:

... the primary purpose was clearly to afford economic relief to low income heads of household who work for a living. These legislative purposes clearly distinguish the earn income credit from a refund of excess withholding taxes, which was held to constitute “property” under Section 70 A(5) (citation omitted). The normal income tax refund is an amount actually deducted from tax payers earnings in excess of the amount required by accurate computation of the rate applied to actual income.... the earned income credit is given effect through refund, but it is not a refund of taxes previously paid.... the effect of the earned income credit legislation is to put money in the pockets of certain needy taxpayers after tax returns are filed, and not to reduce their tax burden during the tax year.

Based on this review of Congressional intent the District Court ruled in favor of the debtor. Since the debtor is eligible to receive an earned income credit, such credit helps to provide the congressional mandated “fresh start” in the postbankruptcy period.

In further support of this position the Court cited Goldberg v. Kelley, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970) wherein the United States Supreme Court gave credence to the theory the earned income credit was an item of social welfare legislation intended to provide low income families with “the very means by which to live”.

Based upon the foregoing, I hold the Federal Income Credit, due to its nature as social welfare relief is exempt property pursuant to Idaho Code § 11-603 (4).

GROCERY CREDIT Unlike the earned income credit which targets a specific economic group, the Grocery Credit allowed under state law is a $15.00 credit which may be claimed once in each tax year by each member of a household.

3

Every deduction is entitled to the credit. The grocery credit is not a form of social welfare legislation intended to provide people with “the very means by which to live.”

Searles, supra, citing Goldberg v. Kelley, supra.

It is an income tax deduction intended to replace sales taxes paid for food. Therefore, the credit would in fact be property of the estate and not subject to exemption.

1

. Idaho Code § 11-603 (4) provides:

Property exempt without limitation. — An individual is entitled to exemption of the following property: ...

(4) benefits the individual is entitled to receive under federal, state, or local public assistance legislation ...

2

.

In re Searles, 445 F.Supp. 749 .

3

. Idaho Code § 63 -3024A.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 8 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →
1991: 11995: 11996: 11997: 11998: 32000: 52001: 12002: 12003: 22004: 12005: 12006: 12008: 12016: 12021: 22022: 119912026peak 2000 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Dever250 B.R. 701 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2000)
  2. In re Brockhouse220 B.R. 623 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 1998)
  3. In re Wooldridge393 B.R. 721 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2008)
  4. In re Brown186 B.R. 224 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1995)
  5. In re Farnsworth558 B.R. 375 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2016)
  6. Bianca Ann MedinaNo. 22-10233 (Bankr. D.N.M. Dec. 16, 2022)

Most recent

  1. Bianca Ann MedinaNo. 22-10233 (Bankr. D.N.M. Dec. 16, 2022)
  2. In re ADELINA MORENONo. WW-21-1124-LBS (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 23, 2021)
  3. Adelina A MorenoNo. 20-42855 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. May 11, 2021)
  4. In re Farnsworth558 B.R. 375 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2016)
  5. In re Wooldridge393 B.R. 721 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2008)
  6. In re Espey347 B.R. 357 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) 5,039
Hoffman v. Searles, 445 F. Supp. 749 (D. Conn. 1978) 31

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list