Leibowitz v. Leibowitz
Opinion
611 So.2d 629 (1993)
Larry LEIBOWITZ, Appellant,
v.
Connie LEIBOWITZ, Appellee.
No. 92-0904.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
February 3, 1993.
Barbara Markley, Support Enforcement Division of Broward County, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert B. Resnick, Boca Raton, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse because the trial court erred in denying the husband's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) seeking relief from an order dated January 23, 1992, modifying child support payments and visitation rights.
We agree with the husband's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion for relief because the husband set forth excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. Tremblay v. Marck, 378 So.2d 855 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 1980); Broward County v. Perdue, 432 So.2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Furthermore, the trial court erred in modifying the wife's child support obligation and visitation rights because the wife filed no pleading requesting such modification. Sentz v. Sentz, 548 So.2d 297 (Fla. 4th *630 DCA 1989). Therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify the child support payments and visitation. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying the husband's motion for relief, and we remand to the trial court to vacate the order dated January 23, 1992.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.