State v. Martinez
State of Connecticut v. Luis Norberto Martinez
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 517 (AC 26180), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court improperly failed to grant the defendant an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence of the victim’s two prior sexual assaults and correctly ordered the remedy of a new trial rather than an evidentiary hearing?
“2. Whether the remedy ordered by the Appellate Court with regard to two counts of the defendant’s conviction is improper because the error identified by the Appellate Court, even if upheld, is wholly irrelevant to and had no effect upon those counts?
“3. Did the trial court deprive the defendant of his due process rights when it denied his request for funds for an expert witness?”
*903 Decided January 7, 2009 Annacarina Jacob, senior assistant public defender, in opposition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.