Salvatore v. Trace
Paul J. Salvatore, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harry W. Trace and Ethel Z. Trace, Defendants-Appellants
Salvatore v. Trace, 262 A.2d 385 (N.J. 1970)
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Carton in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super.
83.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Peancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(observing that contracting parties can waive a 13 A-0347-10T1 writing requirement through their conduct)
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- ADP, LLC v. Eric Manchir
- DEBORAH BURKE VS. FRANKE M. DONLON, III(L-0707-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL S. HETZEL (14-05-1100, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
- Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc.
- R.J.P. Builders, Inc. v. Township of Woolwich
- Ballantyne House Associates v. City of Newark
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.