68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella
Opinion
150 N.J. Super. 47 (1977) 374 A.2d 1222
68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 26, 1977. Decided May 13, 1977.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Gigante & Aslanian, attorneys).
Mr. Howard M. Nashel argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Platoff, Heftler, Harker & Nashel, attorneys).
*48 PER CURIAM.
The portions of the order for judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion reported at 142 N.J. Super. 546 (Law Div. 1976).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.