TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re DePuy

In THE MATTER OF WALLACE S. DePUY, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR-AT-LAW

In re DePuy, 90 A.2d 19 (N.J. 1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 16, 1952
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
90 A.2d 1910 N.J. 2821952 N.J. LEXIS 245
Cited by 6 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam.

This matter is before the court on the presentment of the Bergen County Committee on Ethics and Grievances and on the record of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Erom the record it appears that the respondent entered a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with knowing and willful failure to file income tax returns for the years 1948-1949-1950. The name of the respondent will be stricken from the rolls of attorneys and coimsellors-at-law.

For disbarment — Chief Justice Vandeebilt, and Justices Heheb, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Bueling, Jacobs and Beeunaf — 7.

Opposed — None.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1952: 11956: 11957: 11959: 11963: 11989: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Fitzgerald85 N.W.2d 323 (Neb. 1957)
  2. Borough of Park Ridge v. Salimone120 A.2d 721 (N.J. 1956)
  3. Schultz v. Hinz90 A.2d 19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  4. In re Hynda194 A.2d 235 (N.J. 1963)
  5. In re Willis552 A.2d 979 (N.J. 1989)
  6. In re Alker16 Pa. D. & C.2d 653 (1959)

Most recent

  1. In re Willis552 A.2d 979 (N.J. 1989)
  2. In re Hynda194 A.2d 235 (N.J. 1963)
  3. In re Alker16 Pa. D. & C.2d 653 (1959)
  4. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Fitzgerald85 N.W.2d 323 (Neb. 1957)
  5. Borough of Park Ridge v. Salimone120 A.2d 721 (N.J. 1956)
  6. Schultz v. Hinz90 A.2d 19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Schultz v. Hinz, 90 A.2d 19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list