TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ditko Appeal

Ditko Appeal, 123 A.2d 718 (Pa. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 25, 1956
Judges
Stern, C.J., Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno and Arnold
Citations
123 A.2d 718385 Pa. 4351956 Pa. LEXIS 493
Cited by 23

Opinion

385 Pa. 435 (1956)

Ditko Appeal.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 20, 1956. June 25, 1956.

Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.

*436 Samuel Gorson, with him Albert S. Readinger and Samuel R. Liever, for appellant.

Robert F. Shapiro, Assistant City Solicitor, with him C. Wilson Austin, City Solicitor, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, June 25, 1956:

The order entered in the Court below is affirmed on the Opinion of Judge WARREN K. HESS.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 23 cases

View all citing references →
1958: 11959: 11971: 21972: 11977: 21979: 21980: 41981: 11984: 11985: 21987: 12003: 12004: 22012: 219582026peak 1980 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Siler v. City of Harrisburg422 A.2d 704 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1980)
  2. City of Bethlehem v. Gawlik374 A.2d 540 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1977)
  3. Bell Appeal152 A.2d 731 (Pa. 1959)
  4. Kramer Appeal282 A.2d 386 (Pa. 1971)
  5. Nagel v. City of Bismarck2004 ND 9, 673 N.W.2d 267
  6. Thomas v. PA. HUMAN RELATIONS COMM.527 A.2d 602 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Mickelson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance2012 ND 164, 820 N.W.2d 333
  2. Heier v. N.D. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation2012 ND 171, 820 N.W.2d 394
  3. Nagel v. City of Bismarck2004 ND 9, 673 N.W.2d 267
  4. Fargo Glass and Paint v. Randall2004 ND 4
  5. Erik Maasikas v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyNo. M2002-02652-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2003)
  6. Thomas v. PA. HUMAN RELATIONS COMM.527 A.2d 602 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list