TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Bricker

Commonwealth v. Bricker, Appellant

Commonwealth v. Bricker, 282 A.2d 31 (Pa. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 12, 1971
Docket
Nos. , 16
Judges
Belu, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Barbieri
Citations
282 A.2d 31444 Pa. 4761971 Pa. LEXIS 816

Opinion — Barbieri

Opinion by Mr. Justice Barbieri, After pleading guilty to murder generally, appellant was found guilty of first degree murder at a degree of guilt hearing held on July 22, 1964, and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Appellant filed a Post Conviction Hearing Act * (PCHA) petition on April 3, 1969, al *478 leging, inter alia, that he had not intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. The hearing court found that appellant had, in fact, been denied his right of appeal, and ordered that appellant be permitted to file an appeal as though timely filed. The hearing court, however, went on to discuss the remaining issues raised in the petition and denied relief as to them.

We have decided in Commonwealth v. Robinson, 442 Pa. 512 , 515 n.2, 276 A. 2d 537 (1971), and Commonwealth v. Harris, 443 Pa. 279 , 278 A. 2d 159 (1971) that when it is determined that a defendant has not been properly advised of his right of appeal from a judgment of first degree murder following a plea of guilty to murder generally, the proper practice is for the PCHA court to terminate the hearing and remand the case to the trial court to allow the petitioner to file post-trial motions. See also, Commonwealth v. Lowery, 438 Pa. 89 , 263 A. 2d 332 (1970);

Commonwealth v. Faison, 437 Pa. 432 , 436 n.4, 264 A. 2d 394 (1970).

Accordingly, we remand this case to the court below so that appellant, with the assistance of counsel, may file post-trial motions within 30 days from the date of the entry of this order. In the event that the court below dismisses such motions, appellant shall be permitted to file an appeal from the judgment of sentence as though timely filed.

* Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, §1 (as amended), 10 P.S. §1180-1 et seq.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 11974: 11977: 11978: 11979: 11980: 119732026peak 1973 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commonwealth v. Bricker326 A.2d 279 (Pa. 1974)
  2. Commonwealth v. Morris406 A.2d 337 (Pa. 1979)
  3. Commonwealth v. Stackpole418 A.2d 709 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
  4. Commonwealth v. Bailey390 A.2d 166 (Pa. 1978)
  5. Commonwealth v. Ligon314 A.2d 227 (Pa. 1973)
  6. Commonwealth v. Fauntroy380 A.2d 357 (Pa. 1977)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Stackpole418 A.2d 709 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
  2. Commonwealth v. Morris406 A.2d 337 (Pa. 1979)
  3. Commonwealth v. Bailey390 A.2d 166 (Pa. 1978)
  4. Commonwealth v. Fauntroy380 A.2d 357 (Pa. 1977)
  5. Commonwealth v. Bricker326 A.2d 279 (Pa. 1974)
  6. Commonwealth v. Ligon314 A.2d 227 (Pa. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Commonwealth v. Faison, 264 A.2d 394 (Pa. 1970) 66
Commonwealth v. Robinson, 276 A.2d 537 (Pa. 1971) 30
Commonwealth v. Lowery, 263 A.2d 332 (Pa. 1970) 28
Commonwealth v. Harris, 278 A.2d 159 (Pa. 1971) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list