TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fountainhead Group, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission

The FOUNTAINHEAD GROUP, INC., Marimar Manufacturing Company, Inc., D.B. Smith & Company, Inc., and Blue Mountain Products, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION; Nancy Harvey Steorts, as Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission; Stuart M. Statler, R. David Pittle, Edith B. Sloan, Sam Zagoria, as Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission; And Todd A. Stevenson, as Freedom of Information Officer of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Defendants

Fountainhead Group, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 559 F. Supp. 17 (N.D.N.Y. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, N.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
October 19, 1982
Docket
No. 81-CV-1150
Judges
Munson
Citations
559 F. Supp. 171982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9974

Opinion — Munson

ORDER MUNSON, Chief Judge.

The parties, having applied for an order vacating the Memorandum-Decision and Order of this Court filed December 7, 1981, as clarified by the Order filed March 26, 1982, and substituting in its place an order consistent with the terms of a Stipulation entered into by Counsel to the respective parties, and the Court having read the Stipulation of the parties dated September 28, 1982, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Memorandum-Decision and Order of this Court filed December 7, ,1981, as .clarified by the Order filed March 26, 1982, is vacated, 527 F.Supp. 294 ; and it is further ORDERED, that in accordance with the Stipulation of the parties, defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from disclosing to any person, corporation, or other entity, any documents, material or information relating, directly or indirectly, to (a) the thickness of the bottom dimensions of the garden sprayers manufactured or privately labeled by plaintiffs, and (b) any customer complaints in the possession of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, until such time as the Commission has established final rules and regulations after an opportunity for public review and comment, setting forth procedures to be used and standards to be followed by the Commission in fulfilling its obligations under Section 6(b) of the. Consumer Product Safety Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 2055 (b)) and until the Commis *18 sion has rendered a determination whether to release the documents and information relating to plaintiffs in accordance with the final rules and regulations.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 11985: 12021: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Honeywell, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission582 F. Supp. 1072 (D.D.C. 1984)
  2. General Chemical Corp. v. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering474 N.E.2d 183 (Mass. App. Ct. 1985)
  3. Frank Ortega v. Natural Balance IncNo. 2:13-cv-05942 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2021)

Most recent

  1. Frank Ortega v. Natural Balance IncNo. 2:13-cv-05942 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2021)
  2. General Chemical Corp. v. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering474 N.E.2d 183 (Mass. App. Ct. 1985)
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission582 F. Supp. 1072 (D.D.C. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Fountainhead Group, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 527 F. Supp. 294 (N.D.N.Y. 1981) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list