TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Lowder

The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert L. Lowder, Jr., Defendant—(Delcina Purtle, Petitioner-Appellant.)

People v. Lowder, 316 N.E.2d 159 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 23, 1974
Docket
No. 73-214
Judges
Craven
Citations
316 N.E.2d 15921 Ill. App. 3d 9851974 Ill. App. LEXIS 2297
Cited by 4

Opinion — Craven

Mr. JUSTICE CRAVEN delivered the opinion of the court:

Delcina Purtle, petitioner-appellant, posted $5000 as bail bond on behalf of Robert L. Lowder. The bail bond was subsequently forfeited. Petitioner filed a motion praying that the bail bond be returned to her. Her motion was denied and she appeals. She urges that the State did not comply with the statutory procedures as found in section 110 — 7(g) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, ft 110— 7(g)), for forfeiture of bail bond, by not giving her notice of the forfeiture proceedings.

We find that petitioner had no standing to bring the action to recover the bail bond and therefore she has no standing to appeal. The statute in question does not extend to her the right to be notified that bail bond had been forfeited. The statute specifies that as far as the State is concerned, the 10-percent bail-bond deposit is posted by the accused. The statute requires that notice be given only to the accused since he is entitled to any refund in the event of compliance with the terms of bail. When petitioner furnished the 10-percent deposit, she did so at her own risk. The bail bond serves as a deterrent to flight and if the defendant does indeed flee, then the bond is forfeited.

Accordingly, petitioner’s appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

tiMITH, P. J„ and SIMKINS, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 21978: 11980: 119772026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Cox363 N.E.2d 389 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
  2. People v. Nicholls359 N.E.2d 1095 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
  3. People v. Wood414 N.E.2d 759 (Ill. App. Ct. 1980)
  4. People v. Mitchaner382 N.E.2d 687 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978)

Most recent

  1. People v. Wood414 N.E.2d 759 (Ill. App. Ct. 1980)
  2. People v. Mitchaner382 N.E.2d 687 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978)
  3. People v. Cox363 N.E.2d 389 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
  4. People v. Nicholls359 N.E.2d 1095 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list