State v. Markham
State, Plaintiff, v. Markham, Defendant
Opinion
Per Curiam.
In this original action, commenced in this court upon complaint of the State Board of Bar Commissioners, seeking discipline of Spencer A. Markham, attorney, there is nothing to add to the excellent report of the referee, Judge C. Bernard Dillett. Review of the record amply supports the findings of fact made by the referee, including his conclusion that in this involved series of real estate transactions, unprofitable to all involved, including counsel, there is “. . .
*316 no reason to doubt his [the attorney complained against] good faith or honesty in doing what he could to carry it out.” The recommendation of the referee that the charges be dismissed is approved and accepted. The complaint is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.