TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Jordan

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rex Allen JORDAN, Defendant and Appellant

State v. Jordan, 261 N.W.2d 126 (S.D. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1978
Docket
No. 12062
Judges
Heck, Zas-Trow
Citations
261 N.W.2d 1261978 S.D. LEXIS 279

Opinion — Heck

HECK, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Rex Allen Jordan, was charged with two counts of first degree robbery. During the course of the proceedings, he moved to suppress certain evidence. After due hearing, the motion was denied. Later, after plea negotiations, the defendant entered pleas of guilty to both counts. At the arraignment, the defendant’s counsel stated that the defendant wished to reserve his right to appeal any of the rulings previously made by the court. The reservation of the right to appeal was not made a part of the plea agreement. The circuit judge advised the defendant that by entering his pleas of guilty he would waive his right to appeal the prior rulings of the court.

The question before this court is whether a defendant who has knowingly and intelligently entered a plea of guilty can reserve his right to appeal nonjurisdictional matters.

This court previously has said that a plea of guilty, “if voluntarily and understandably made, is conclusive as to the defendant’s guilt, admitting all the facts and waiving all nonjurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings * * *.”

State ex rel. Condon v. Erickson, 85 S.D. 302, 307 , 182 N.W.2d 304, 306-7 .

There is no question that a voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty was entered by the defendant. By his plea of guilty he has admitted the facts establishing the essential elements of the crime with which he was charged. We conclude that he has waived his right to appeal nonjurisdictional defects.

Since the defendant is not entitled to appeal, the other objections raised need not be considered.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

HECK, Circuit Judge, sitting for ZAS-TROW, J., disqualified.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1978: 11979: 11983: 11985: 11986: 11987: 21990: 11992: 11993: 11994: 119782026peak 1987 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Losieau266 N.W.2d 259 (S.D. 1978)
  2. State v. Schulz409 N.W.2d 655 (S.D. 1987)
  3. State v. Cowley408 N.W.2d 758 (S.D. 1987)
  4. State v. Crow504 N.W.2d 336 (S.D. 1993)
  5. State v. Janssen371 N.W.2d 353 (S.D. 1985)
  6. State v. Grosh387 N.W.2d 503 (S.D. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Two Eagle v. Leapley522 N.W.2d 765 (S.D. 1994)
  2. State v. Crow504 N.W.2d 336 (S.D. 1993)
  3. State v. Cobb479 N.W.2d 879 (S.D. 1992)
  4. State v. Kettle452 N.W.2d 774 (S.D. 1990)
  5. State v. Schulz409 N.W.2d 655 (S.D. 1987)
  6. State v. Cowley408 N.W.2d 758 (S.D. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Condon v. Erickson, 182 N.W.2d 304 (S.D. 1970) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list