Commonwealth v. GENTLES
Commonwealth v. Gentles, 909 A.2d 303 (Pa. 2006)
Opinion
909 A.2d 303 (2006)
COM.
v.
GENTLES No. 232 EAL (2006).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 3, 2006.
Dispostion of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(stating that act of wrapping one’s arms around another person and inserting one’s tongue into another’s mouth clearly involves touching of intimate part; such act does not occur outside of context of sexual or intimate situation)
-
(holding evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of indecent assault where defendant wrapped his arms around victim and inserted his tongue into victim’s mouth because act would not occur outside of context of sexual or intimate situation)
-
(stating issues that challenge discretionary aspects of sentencing are generally waived if they are not raised during sentencing proceedings or in post-sentence motion)
-
(“Objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or raised in a motion to modify the sentence imposed at that hearing.”)
Cited by 394 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.