TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Reed

In re Reed, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 12, 1970
Docket
No. 706
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
396 U.S. 27490 S. Ct. 56224 L. Ed. 2d 4641970 U.S. LEXIS 3247

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11980: 219772026peak 1980 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hagopian v. Justices of Supreme Judicial Court429 F. Supp. 367 (D. Mass. 1977)
  2. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee422 A.2d 998 (Me. 1980)
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kerpelman420 A.2d 940 (Md. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee422 A.2d 998 (Me. 1980)
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kerpelman420 A.2d 940 (Md. 1980)
  3. Hagopian v. Justices of Supreme Judicial Court429 F. Supp. 367 (D. Mass. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lyon v. Flournoy, 396 U.S. 274 (1970) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list