TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Santana v. City of Hartford

Santana v. City of Hartford, 901 A.2d 1223 (Conn. 2006)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 22, 2006
Judges
Palmer
Citations
901 A.2d 1223279 Conn. 902279 Conn. 9012006 Conn. LEXIS 258

Opinion

901 A.2d 1223 (2006) 279 Conn. 902

Alberto SANTANA

v.

CITY OF HARTFORD.

Alberto Santana

v.

Bruce P. Marquis et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 22, 2006.

Kimball Haines Hunt and Nicole L. Barber, in support of the petition.

Helen Apostolidis, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 445 , 894 A.2d 307 (2006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the plaintiff's rights to due process under the state and federal constitutions were violated under the facts of this case?"

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17687.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2007: 120072026peak 2007 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Santana v. City of Hartford918 A.2d 267 (Conn. 2007)

Most recent

  1. Santana v. City of Hartford918 A.2d 267 (Conn. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Santana v. City of Hartford, 894 A.2d 307 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list