TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Savage

In Re Robert E. SAVAGE, Debtor

In re Savage, 60 B.R. 10 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · Bankruptcy Courts
Decided
April 2, 1986
Docket
No. Bankruptcy 8400549
Judges
Votolato
Citations
60 B.R. 101986 Bankr. LEXIS 6350

Opinion — Votolato

ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S STATUTORY FEE ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Heard on the debtor’s objection to the allowance to the trustee of the full statutory fee computed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586 (e).

This dispute raises the identical issue recently treated at length by this Court in In re Sousa, 46 B.R. 343 (Bankr.D.R.I.1985) — whether the Court may review the statutory compensation of a standing Chapter 13 trustee operating under the provisions of the United States Trustee Pilot Program, 28 U.S.C. §§ 581-589 , and 11 U.S.C. §§ 15101-151326 . At a conference held on October 17, 1985, the parties agreed to submit that issue for determination upon memoranda.

After considering the briefs and reply memoranda, and to our personal disappointment, we have not been persuaded to alter our holding in Sousa , and we conclude that in pilot, as well as in nonpilot, jurisdictions, the Bankruptcy Court retains the authority and responsibility to determine the reasonableness of all fees, including compensation to the standing Chapter 13 trustee.

1

Accordingly, the trustee may submit within 10 days of the date of this order, an application detailing the services performed and the results achieved. Thereafter, upon notice, the matter will be scheduled for hearing, and a fee determination will be made, after the Court has considered the positions of the debtor and other interested parties.

1

. The argument that the debtor has waived his right to object to the trustee's fee is without merit and is rejected.

See United States Trustee's Memorandum of Law at 12-14.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 319862026peak 1986 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Savage67 B.R. 700 (D.R.I. 1986)
  2. In re Tartaglia61 B.R. 439 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1986)
  3. In re Tartaglia62 B.R. 398 (D.R.I. 1986)

Most recent

  1. In re Savage67 B.R. 700 (D.R.I. 1986)
  2. In re Tartaglia62 B.R. 398 (D.R.I. 1986)
  3. In re Tartaglia61 B.R. 439 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Sousa, 46 B.R. 343 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1985) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list