TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. RULO

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel Edward RULO, Appellant

State v. Rulo, 295 S.W.3d 909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 3, 2009
Docket
No. WD 69512
Judges
Ellis, Howard, Welsh
Citations
295 S.W.3d 9092009 Mo. App. LEXIS 15482009 WL 3583296

Opinion — Per Curiam

ORDER PER CURIAM:

Daniel Rulo appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of tampering in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and careless and imprudent driving. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support Rulo’s convictions and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Edwards v. Dir. of Revenue, State, 295 S.W.3d 909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list