People v. Rastall
Opinion
20 Mich. App. 264 (1969) 174 N.W.2d 33
PEOPLE
v.
RASTALL Docket No. 4,728.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided November 26, 1969.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Sanford Kesten, for defendant.
Before: LEVIN, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and DANHOF, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
On June 6, 1967, defendant was convicted of armed robbery after a nonjury trial, CLS 1961, § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 28.797).
The only issue on appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion by denying defense counsel's *265 motion for a second continuance made on the day of trial.
The Michigan Supreme Court has repeatedly held that granting or refusing applications for continuances is within the discretion of the trial court, and unless it is shown that his discretion was abused, his action will not be reversed, People v. Burby (1922), 218 Mich 46 . See also People v. Knox (1961), 364 Mich 620 ; CL 1948, § 768.2 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1025); GCR 1963, 503.
It is clear from the record in this case that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.