Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Norris
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Norris
Opinion
Per Curiam.
This is a bill of complaint to reform a release given for $62.50. A collision between an *280 automobile driven by Frances E. Kovach, allegedly owned by William H. Norris, and a semitrailer owned by Wagoner Transportation Company, Inc., driven by G-erald A. Hardin, resulted in Hardin’s death and other loss. There was a settlement of the suit at law by the administratrix of Hardin’s estate against Kovach .and Norris, in which Wagoner, among others, joined, and, concurrently, releases we're given by all plaintiffs to all defendants. One year later, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, workmen’s compensation insurer for Wagoner, filed suit against Norris as third-party owner of the automobile involved. Upon motion to dismiss, all proceedings were held in abeyance pending the filing and disposition of proceedings in chancery by plaintiff to set aside or reform the said general release given by Wagoner to defendants. In the subsequent chancery suit brought for reformation, it was held by the trial chancellor, that “the matter of workmen’s compensation, and payments which have been made therefor by the plaintiff, was in no way considered at the time the release was executed and that the release in matter of fact was intended to and did discharge liability for a property loss as distinguished from workmen’s compensation liability.”
Affirmed. The case is controlled by Denton v. Utley, 350 Mich 332 . Costs to appellee.
Dethmers, C. J., and Carr, Kelly, Smith, Black Edwards, Kavanagh, and Souris, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.