TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pre-Fab Transit Co. v. Carpentier

Pre-Fab Transit Co. Et Al., Appellees, vs. Charles F. Carpentier, Secretary of State, Appellant

Pre-Fab Transit Co. v. Carpentier, 162 N.E.2d 378 (Ill. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 18, 1959
Docket
No. 35254
Judges
Bristow
Citations
162 N.E.2d 37817 Ill. 2d 5151959 Ill. LEXIS 370

Opinion — Bristow

Mr. Justice Bristow delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal is from a judgment of the circuit court of Sangamon County which ordered the issuance of a writ of mandamus directed to Charles F. Carpentier as Secretary of State, commanding him to accept applications for and issue registration cards and registration plates for certain vehicles owned by appellees.

Appellees filed their petition for a writ of mandamus in the circuit court of Sangamon County. Appellant filed his motion to dismiss the petition. The circuit court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss and appellant elected to stand on his motion. Whereupon an order for the issuance of a writ of mandamus was entered. Hence the cause is before this court solely on the pleadings and the sufficiency thereof.

Appellees’ petition alleges that on December 2, 1958, appellees submitted to the Motor Vehicle Registration Division of the office of the Secretary of State “certain applications” for the registration of 10 semi-trailers pursuant to section 3 — 402 of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Law, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957) chap. 95)4, par. 3 — 402,) and on the same date submitted applications for renewal of registrations for 155 semi-trailers pursuant to section 3 — 413; that the applications were accompanied by certified checks “in the appropriate amount as provided for in Section 3 — 801(d) of Chap. 95)4, Illinois Revised Statutes;” that by virtue of the provisions of sections 3 — 408 and 3 — 410 it became the duty of appellant to issue appropriate registration cards for the semi-trailers and that on December 2 and on other occasions petitioners requested and demanded of appellant that he issue registration cards and plates for such semi-trailers but that appellant refused so to do.

Appellees then prayed the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding appellant to accept the applications and to issue the registration cards and registration plates.

The foregoing is the extent of the allegations contained in appellees’ petition which was filed in the circuit court of Sangamon County on December 8, 1958.

Appellant filed his motion to dismiss the petition for mandamus, and the grounds urged in the motion are that appellees failed to exhaust their administrative remedies as provided in the Motor Vehicle Law of the State of Illinois and under the provisions of the Administrative Review Act.

The identical question raised by this appeal was before this court and was decided by this court in the case of People ex rel. United Motor Coach Co. v. Carpentier, 17 Ill.2d 303 . There we held that the exhaustion of the remedies provided for in section 2 — 117 of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Law, which provides that upon the denial of the issuance of a license the aggrieved party may secure a hearing before the Secretary of State, or a hearing officer designated by him, and further provides that the action of the Secretary of State in denying the issuance of a license shall be subject to judicial review under the provisions of the Administrative Review Act, is a condition precedent to the seeking of judicial relief.

In that case we further held that judicial review by a mandamus proceeding cannot be resorted to in the absence of an exhaustion of the remedies provided for in section 2 — 117.

Since it does not appear in this cause that appellees pursued the remedies provided for in section 2 — 117, nor did they seek judicial review as prescribed by the Administrative Review Act, these questions having been sufficiently raised in the motion to dismiss, the circuit court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition and in ordering the writ of mandamus to issue. The judgment of the circuit court of Sangamon County is therefore reversed.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11964: 21965: 11975: 11984: 119612026peak 1964 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Frank v. State Sanitary Water Board178 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. App. Ct. 1961)
  2. People ex rel. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Hulman201 N.E.2d 103 (Ill. 1964)
  3. Varnes v. Lentz332 N.E.2d 639 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  4. Chestnut v. Lodge210 N.E.2d 336 (Ill. App. Ct. 1965)
  5. Peo. ex rel. Chi. & NW Ry. v. Hulman201 N.E.2d 103 (Ill. 1964)
  6. City of Mishawaka ex rel. Department of Redevelopment v. Fred W. Bubb Funeral Chapel, Inc.469 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)

Most recent

  1. City of Mishawaka ex rel. Department of Redevelopment v. Fred W. Bubb Funeral Chapel, Inc.469 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984)
  2. Varnes v. Lentz332 N.E.2d 639 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  3. Chestnut v. Lodge210 N.E.2d 336 (Ill. App. Ct. 1965)
  4. Peo. ex rel. Chi. & NW Ry. v. Hulman201 N.E.2d 103 (Ill. 1964)
  5. People ex rel. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Hulman201 N.E.2d 103 (Ill. 1964)
  6. Frank v. State Sanitary Water Board178 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. App. Ct. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. United Motor Coach Co. v. Carpentier, 161 N.E.2d 97 (Ill. 1959) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list