Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Sixty-Third and Halsted Realty Co.
Goldblatt Bros., Inc., Et Al., Appellants, vs. Sixty-Third and Halsted Realty Co., Appellee; Sixty-Third and Halsted Realty Co., Appellee, vs. Goldblatt Bros., Inc., Appellant
Opinion
Per Curiam :
Petitions for leave to appeal have been allowed in Goldblatt Bros., Inc., v. Sixty-third and Halsted Realty Co., No. 31968, and Sixty-third and Halsted Realty Co. v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc., No. 31969. For purposes of a hearing and opinion the cases are consolidated.
The parties in these cases have filed written stipulations agreeing to the disposition of the cases. The stipulation in each case is as follows: • “It is stipulated by and between the parties hereto by their respective attorneys of record that the judgment of the Appellate Court shall be affirmed.
“It is further stipulated by all parties hereto that any words or phrases or conclusions in the opinion of the Appellate Court which in any manner reflect upon the good faith or gbod motives of appellant, Goldblatt Bros., Inc., shall be considered as excepted to by Goldblatt Bros., Inc.”
The court having considered the records submitted and the stipulations of the parties, it is ordered that the judgments be affirmed. The phrases and conclusions in the opinion of the Appellate Court which in any manner reflect upon the good faith and good motives of appellant, Goldblatt Bros., Inc., are, in our opinion, unsubstantiated in the record.
Judgments affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of Peoria
- Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad
- Batiste v. Furnco Construction Corporation
Most recent
- N In Comm Trans Dist v. Chicago S Shore/S Bend RR
- Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of Peoria
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.