TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Terry James

People v. James, 368 N.W.2d 892 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 15, 1985
Docket
No. 75558
Judges
Kelly, Beasley, Stempien
Citations
368 N.W.2d 892142 Mich. App. 19
Cited by 8

Opinion — Stempien

M. R. Stempien, J.

On September 14, 1983, defendant pled guilty to armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and afterwards was sentenced to from 20 to 40 years’ imprisonment. He appeals as of right, first challenging the trial court’s ruling that a confession he made was voluntarily given and second arguing that his sentence was excessive. We affirm.

We will not review defendant’s first claim of error for it was waived by his plea of guilty. The fact that defendant made a confession which could have been suppressed did not undercut the state’s authority or ability to proceed with the trial because the state had other evidence against defendant at its disposal.

People v Alvin Johnson, 396 Mich 424, 444 ; 240 NW2d 729 (1976).

As to defendant’s second claim of error, we note that a trial judge’s failure to sentence a criminal defendant to the precise sentence range indicated by the Sentencing Guidelines Manual does not necessitate resentencing. The guidelines are just *21 what that word indicates, guidelines. They only assist the sentencing judge in the very difficult task of imposing sentence. They permit the court to assess quickly and consistently its current case vis-á-vis similar cases statewide. However, each sentence must be tailored in the court’s discretion and imposed according to the facts and circumstances at hand. Accordingly, the sentencing judge is free to exercise reasonable discretion to depart from the guidelines to develop a sentence best suited for the case before him or her. The judge is simply required to make a record of the reasons for such discretionary departure. Administrative Order 1984-1, 418 Mich lxxx .

In this case, although the sentencing court did depart from the recommendations outlined in the guidelines, it properly stated its reasons for doing so; therefore, no error exists.

In reviewing the sentence imposed in this case, we do not find that the sentencing court abused its discretion.

People v Coles, 417 Mich 523, 550-551 ; 339 NW2d 440 (1983).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1985: 21988: 41990: 12009: 119852026peak 1988 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Porter425 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  2. People v. Frank Johnson381 N.W.2d 740 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985)
  3. People v. Reyna459 N.W.2d 75 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990)
  4. People v. Howell423 N.W.2d 629 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  5. People v. Johnson434 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. People v. Strunk431 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Kincade v. Wolfenbarger324 F. App'x 482 (6th Cir. 2009)
  2. People v. Reyna459 N.W.2d 75 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990)
  3. People v. Johnson434 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  4. People v. Strunk431 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  5. People v. Porter425 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. People v. Howell423 N.W.2d 629 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Coles, 339 N.W.2d 440 (Mich. 1983) 321
People v. Johnson, 240 N.W.2d 729 (Mich. 1976) 128

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list