Norman v. Elrod
JOHN DAVID NORMAN, Petitioner, v. RICHARD ELROD, Sheriff, Et Al., Respondents
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he was incorrectly advised at the time of his plea of guilty that there would be no mandatory parole term following the expiration of his sentence. No claim is made that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter or over defendant’s person, and habeas corpus is not available. (Hughes v. Kiley (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 261 ; Long v. Israel (1977), 56 Ill. App. 3d 14 .) The motion by petitioner for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus is denied, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to file a post-conviction petition in the trial court.
Motion denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.