TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Pulido

In Re ERNESTO PULIDO, a Minor, Appellant.—(The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee.)

In re Pulido, 372 N.E.2d 822 (Ill. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 13, 1978
Docket
No. 50298
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
372 N.E.2d 82269 Ill. 2d 39314 Ill. Dec. 5431978 Ill. LEXIS 210
Cited by 5

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

After a finding of juvenile delinquency and commitment to a correctional facility, the defendant moved for bond pending appeal. Both the trial court and appellate court denied the motion on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. Supreme Court Rule 660(a) (65 Ill. 2d R. 660(a)) provides that appeals from final judgments in delinquent minor proceedings shall be governed by the rules applicable to criminal cases, except as otherwise provided. Rule 609(b) (58 Ill. 2d R. 609(b)) provides for bail pending appeal where a defendant is sentenced to imprisonment. There is no statutory provision or rule providing that Rule 609 does not apply in juvenile delinquency cases, and the trial court and appellate court were in error in holding that they lacked jurisdiction to fix bond. Since applications for bond pending appeal should be addressed in the first instance to the trial court, we express no opinion as to whether bond should be allowed. It is ordered, in the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction, that the circuit court of Cook County, juvenile division, consider defendant’s application for bond pending appeal.

It is unnecessary to consider the motion by petitioner for bond pending appeal, or, in the alternative, to remand this cause to the trial court with instructions.

The motion by petitioner for leave to present oral argument on motion for bond pending appeal is denied.

Supervisory order entered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1978: 11979: 11982: 11995: 219782026peak 1995 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re WC657 N.E.2d 908 (Ill. 1995)
  2. People v. Buchanan379 N.E.2d 122 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978)
  3. People v. Thomas396 N.E.2d 31 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979)
  4. People v. W.C.657 N.E.2d 908 (Ill. 1995)
  5. People ex rel. Davis v. Vazquez441 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 1982)

Most recent

  1. In re WC657 N.E.2d 908 (Ill. 1995)
  2. People v. W.C.657 N.E.2d 908 (Ill. 1995)
  3. People ex rel. Davis v. Vazquez441 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 1982)
  4. People v. Thomas396 N.E.2d 31 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979)
  5. People v. Buchanan379 N.E.2d 122 (Ill. App. Ct. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list