TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Disciplinary Action James H. O'Hagan

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against James H. O'hagan, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

In re Disciplinary Action James H. O'Hagan, 450 N.W.2d 571 (Minn. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1990
Docket
No. C4-89-2152
Citations
450 N.W.2d 5711990 Minn. LEXIS 301990 WL 3220

Opinion

ORDER The Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility on December 5, 1989, filed a petition with this court in which the Director alleged that the respondent had misappropriated approximately $3,000,000 from his law firm’s trust fund accounts and had committed frauds against a client by requesting funds in a certain amount while actually settling for much lower amounts, retaining the difference for. his personal use. By court order dated December 5, 1989, this court temporarily suspended the respondent from the practice of law pending final determination of the disciplinary proceedings.

More than 20 days have elapsed since service of the Director’s petition upon the respondent. The respondent has failed to serve or file his answer to the petition as required by Minnesota Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 13(a). Accordingly, the allegations contained in the Director’s petition are deemed admitted. Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp. 13(b). Additionally, respondent, by letter to the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility dated December 21, 1989, and received by that office on December 26, stated he did not intend to file an Answer to the Petition and he agreed to disbarment.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 15, Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp., IT IS ORDERED that respondent James H. O'Ha-gan is hereby disbarred from the practice of law effective immediately.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1992: 12026: 119922026peak 1992 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The N.C. State Bar v. KeyNo. 25-597 (N.C. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2026)
  2. In re Anonymous No. 32 D.B. 8913 Pa. D. & C.4th 478 (1992)

Most recent

  1. The N.C. State Bar v. KeyNo. 25-597 (N.C. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2026)
  2. In re Anonymous No. 32 D.B. 8913 Pa. D. & C.4th 478 (1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Harms v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 300, 450 N.W.2d 571 (Minn. 1990) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list