TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roberson v. Leak

Cornelius Roberson, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Leak, Defendant-Appellant

Roberson v. Leak, 218 N.E.2d 819 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 10, 1966
Docket
No. Gen. 51,359
Judges
English
Citations
218 N.E.2d 81972 Ill. App. 2d 111966 Ill. App. LEXIS 841

Opinion — English

MR. JUSTICE ENGLISH delivered the opinion of the court.

Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,500. Defendant seeks review of that judgment.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss this appeal because:

(1) Defendant filed no post-trial motion and the time for filing such a motion has expired.

(2) Section 68.1(2) of the Civil Practice Act provides that relief desired after trial must be by post-trial motion containing “the points relied upon, particularly specifying the grounds in support thereof,” and an appellant may not urge in the reviewing court any point not thus particularly specified in a post-trial motion. Ill Rev Stats (1965), c 110, § 68.1(2).

(3) It appears from defendant’s Notice of Appeal that the only review sought is of error alleged to have occurred during the course of the trial.

(4) Therefore, nothing has been preserved which could properly constitute a basis for review by this court.

We believe the point raised by plaintiff’s motion is valid, but consider that the appropriate action for this court to take, under the circumstances, is to affirm the judgment of the trial court, rather than to dismiss the appeal. Johnson Ford Co., Inc. v. Lewan, 71 Ill App2d 420, 218 NE2d 893 .

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

DRUCKER, P. J. and McCORMICK, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11974: 11977: 11981: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Portock v. Freeman369 N.E.2d 201 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
  2. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. J & G Restaurant, Inc.418 N.E.2d 909 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981)
  3. Beanland v. Sweitzer314 N.E.2d 736 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
  4. Farnsworth v. Shops Building222 N.E.2d 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. J & G Restaurant, Inc.418 N.E.2d 909 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981)
  2. Portock v. Freeman369 N.E.2d 201 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
  3. Beanland v. Sweitzer314 N.E.2d 736 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
  4. Farnsworth v. Shops Building222 N.E.2d 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Johnson Ford Co. v. Lewan, 218 N.E.2d 893 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list