Dean v. State
Keith DEAN and Cornelius Harper, Appellants (Defendants Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below)
Opinion
PRENTICE, Justice.
This opinion is supplemental to our opinion herein filed April 14, 1982, 433 N.E.2d 1172 , the content hereof having been inadvertently omitted.
ISSUE VII Defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In so doing they ask us to rejudge the credibility of the prosecutrix who identified them in court as her assailants. Her uncorroborated testimony, which is the only evidence linking Defendants to the crimes, is sufficient to sustain the convictions for Rape, Tillman v. State, (1981) Ind., 426 N.E.2d 1149, 1150 , Robbery, Geisleman v. State, (1980) Ind., 410 N.E.2d 1293, 1295 , and Kidnapping, Maclin v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 163, 165 .
We find no reversible error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
GIVAN, C.J., and DeBRULER, HUNTER and PIVARNIK, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.