Devaney v. Sarno
Robert A. Devaney, an Infant by His Guardian Ad Litem John R. Devaney and John R. Devaney and Jeanne Devaney, Individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Louis Sarno and Central Volkswagen Inc., Defendants and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N. J. Super.
414.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford — 7.
For reversal — Fone.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("Under such circumstances, it was for the jury to say whether Devaney, conscious of the risk of driving without a seat belt and the possibility of being involved in an accident, acted unreasonably in driving his car on the day in question.")
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.